Twelve Angry Men Essay -- essays research papers

Twelve hazardous Men is a very interesting play about an regrettable young man, who was convicted of killing his dad. The worst part was, the young man was only if nineteen, and his life was just starting. The jurors listened to all the evidence, then came the hard part, making the close guilty, or innocent. Eleven jurors verbalize guilty and only one said innocent. There was a lot of peer pressure involved. I determined to write about different peer pressures three of the jurors used. The three jurors I picked are juror 10, juror 7, and juror 8.The first juror I want to write about is 10. Juror 10 was using a lot of sarcasm, whenever he was trying to prove his point, or prove mortal else wrong. I think that this method of peer pressure is one of the approximately powerful ones. I believes so, because when you are embarrassed in front of 11 other people (in this case jurors) you do not know, authentically lowers your self-esteem. It may lower it to the point where you will say guilty, eve though kabbalistic down inside, you will feel that the person is innocent. This is a quote I picked to illustrate sarcasm skillfully used by 10 "Youre a pretty smart fellow, arent you?" I think this one sentence could really put anyone down, and make anyone feel embarrassed, and maybe stupid. Another juror I decided to write about is 7. He was muscle flexing most of the time. muscle-builder flexing means, he was raising his voice, even screaming at everyone, as if he was the boss. Whenever 8 was trying to ...