Crime and Punishment Essay :: essays research papers

By the end of Dostoyeskys offence and Punishment, the reader is no longer under the illusion of the possible public of extra usual men. For an open-minded reader, and even perhaps the closed-minded ones too, the book is a journey by dint of Raskolnikovs proposed supposition on crime. It is a conjecture based on the ideas that had been printed and read a thousand times(313) by both Hegel and Nietzsche. Hegel, a Ger art object philosopher, influenced Dostoyesky with his utilitarian emphasis on the ends quite an than the means whereby a superman existed as one that stood above the ordinary man, but worked for the benefit of all mankind. Nietsches more selfish doctrine focused on the rights to power which allowed one to act in a Hegelian manner. In committing his crime, Raskolnikov experienced the ultimate punishment as he realized that his existence was not that of the extraordinary man presented in his theory. In chapter five of part three in Crime and Punishment, this theory is describe by its creator, Raskolnikov. Such an innovative theory would clearly accommodate situated him in the extraordinary category, but when he fails to meet its standards, by submitting to the jet law through his confession, the theory crumbles right before the readers eyes. The majority of Raskolnikovs theory seems logical until the reader arrives at its virtuoso essential flaw. Raskolnikovs idea that the enactment of a crime is constantly accompanied by unwellness(311) was one aspect of the theory which, through its accuracy in Raskolnikovs crime, seemed to lend validity to the entirety of the theory several brief experiences with faintness on the character Raskolnikovs behalf, imply the veracity of his ideas.After inferring from the rationality of Raskolnikovs hypothesis on illness that the rest of his working theory would too be correct, the reader is light-emitting diode down a path of definite expectations for his/her extraordinary narrator. This path would have been one whereby Raskolnikov was able to implement widespread well being as a result of his murders. Furthermore, he would have been able to avoid unveiling to the common law of the ordinary people in order to touch on his greatness. This is not, in fact, what happens though. Rather, Raskolnikov is forced to confess by several factors including the very devotion of being discovered. This fear is emphasized to illustrate his displacement from the extraordinary man an extraordinary man would not have possessed such fears since he would know that he had a right to execute such actions .