The Steady Rise of Divorce Rates

Prior to 1950s, separate used to be operose to obtain and deal seldom get break due to their religion and their beliefs. eople were looked down on if they were divorced and it was impossible for them to get married in church. (B atomic number 18 RE) Nowadays, people belong more and more open-minded. They label to accept new ideas and are more acceptive to minority. disunite become a familiar part of life. However, there are some(prenominal) reasons that cause the more and more acceptance of the divorce beside sacred reason. First, people starts to pursue unison and put happiness in their first place. In state to seek happier lives for themselves, they take cargo slight and less poorly and choose not to clear up problems but go at once into divorce. Next, women no longer original g shutdowner inequality, which ultimately metamorphose the expectations of marriage. Moreover, the divorce laws became less and less strict that make divorce easier and less costly.\nP rior to 1960s, people tail assembly only end the marriage if people can provide proofs of their spouses guilt of marital mis deport. This is very time eat and expensive process since he/she would have to hire an lawyer for the trial and pay a extreme large numerate of money for investigation and requests for evidence. So what has caused the divorce rate dramatically enlarge after the juvenile 1960s? There is several answers to this question and one of them is the no-fault divorce law. From the late 1960s, U.S governments has began to accept the no-fault divorce. It is a concept that is less restrictive. join couple can direct divorce without the consent of some(prenominal) spouses and does not need to conduct any faults. No-fault divorce law business leader logically place us to expect an increase in the divorce judge because it has reduced the legal obstacles, the economic costs, and the psychological consequences of divorce. said Nakonezny, Shull and Rodgers (Journal of wedding and Family ,478) Despite no-fault divorce might not ...