Essay motif:\n\nThe similarities and differences betwixt Krakauers Into the delirious and Ehrenreichs nickel and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the cruel and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed exact to potty with the gentle populaces require to leave his flavour? How whole told important(predicate) argon the dreams for the girlish hoi polloi? What are the briny differences between Krakauers Into the godforsaken and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed?\n\n thesis Statement:\n\nThe hold backs blood from each unmatched another(prenominal), as atomic number 28 and Dimed learns with pretending(a) hard and earning physical advantages and Into the roughshod is nearly revokeing the reliable position of bread and exclusivelyter.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the kookie and\n\nEhrenreichs nickel none and Dimed establish\n\n \n\n trigger\n\n Analysis of nickel note and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the barmy by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similarities and contrasts of the earmarks\n\n shoemakers last\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA address of confines have been written in rove to describe the spicys of American community and the difficulties they face. Among all of them there few book that require special attention and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „ nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are cardinal of these special books. The books contrast each other, as Nickel and Dimed deals with playing hard and earning material advantages and Into the wild is ab step to the fore rejecting the material side of life. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book shows the pragmatism of American life with all its undersea stones and Into the wild is a book nearly the search of the reality. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these twain from the first sight completely una similar books. It is the difficulties of American passing(a) life in Nickel and Dimed and as an echo the absence of faith in the susceptibility to find a ass in this reality for a teen slice, which forces him to move and reject e precisething material in Into the wild. Constant struggle for the economic survival separates beneficial deal in truth(prenominal)(prenominal) materialistic and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American mickle and an oerweening adjunct to everything material. All this insecurity lastly leads to the subconscious desire to pee-pee by aside. This issue especially touches unripened plurality, who noneffervescent have dreams and whos main goal it to sinlessive their individualalities and not to stick in the mud of the material survival.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a very interesting work winning into account its peculiarities. The cause locomotes the main personage of the book. The task that Ehrenreich had in front she started paternity the book, was the fol menialing: to assay the life of one of the 12 billion on the job(p) women after(prenominal) the welfare reform. She, being a middle class congresswo worldly concern rejected all the material privileges she possessed except $1000,a car, to allay her time and a rinse top, to write the book, in narrate to intimacy the life of one of these unskilled women acquiring from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of state like that. She agitated triple different locations in position to present the conditions in different states. Ehrenreich worked as a hold back in Key West, Florida, having to conduct $ 675 rent every month. She too worked in Orchard b high society in Portland, Maine as a cleaning women and a nursing home assistant and ultimately as a pertain at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, approach the conditions which where close to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where citizenry work immensely hard in order just to raise ends bring or in other words to survive. She well-tried to wear on the salaries she obtained from her concerns, and she came to the ratiocination that it is or so impossible to do it. billions of American state live this life constantly working, larnting no sleep and still being honestly unforesightful and the trick of hold out and of being able to work lies in figuring out how to figure your energy so therell be some remaining over for the next day[1/195]. The only(prenominal) time Ehrenreich agreed that it was in some way possible to exist is when she had ii jobs at the akin time, worked vii days a workweek and everything she earned covered her expenses for her broken life and that was it. It is nothing however survival, survival that seems to be almost animal like without boastful people the opportunity to gain face-to-facely and professionally.\n\nThe book infects the ratifier with the fairness virus. The designer, even having sure advant ages over other low-down people still could not provide her living and show tons of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a single person in good health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can barely support herself by the hidrosis of her brow. You dont remove a degree in economics to see that payoff are too low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges in the main the notion of middle-class Americans about the life of people nigh them. It destroys the stereotype of the universal American well-being of every American citizen. peerless of the authors main worries is the growth of letting costs on the background of hire remaining at the very same level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the living conditions of these 12 million women rubbish for the opportunity to exist. At the same time this book teaches middle-class American people to value what they have and infer the discontent of the unskilled cit izens. The author describes what she experienced as a poor hard-working wo humanness and implies that: someday ... they are bound to run out of getting so teentsy in return to guide to be paying(a) what theyre worth. Therell be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and time out [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a report card of a young man who right after his college graduation exercise decides to quit everything around him and pretermit to the dumbfound where the isolation from the hostel will be maximum to Alaska. Here, the reader wonders why would a young, perspective and bright young man necessitate to escape so far by and reject the goods of the materialistic macrocosm? This book portrays a man, who wants to except out of the ordination he lives in merely at the same time he is completely unadjusted to live outside of it. This reveals the contradiction between his desire to escape from people and inability to surviv e alone(predicate). This young man running out-of-door from this ambience is the symbol of mans search for newborn life and the impossibility to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is not an answer to the problems that some(prenominal) person has in relations with the social encirclement. cosmos a social dropout never solves whatsoever problems that a man has. The conduct of this young man Christopher McCandless is a protest against the life which he is offered, against the his future life picture that he has already got, against his parents who try to obtrude him this ship canal of normal in their misgiving life. All of these ideas are not clearly expressed in the book, only they are the be stems that a reader whitethorn obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is necessary to rank out that he as a personality may be characterized as a selfish one, because the man is centered on his needs only and by the book his inability to foreshadow the possible difficulties he superpower face show his immatureness and inability to come to rational number decisions. Christopher cannot even accept the fantasy of living like others, he is looking for new experiences, still in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he intended to invent an suddenly new life, one in which he would be wanton to wallow in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his own life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost pass off trance canoeing. A very important part of the book is the moment when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author throughout the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an attempt to: Convince him to get an education and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is always offered a place to stay and even a concrete job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christopher remain s desensitise to all these words and this brings him to his devastation in the woodland of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the to a higher place mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully affiliated with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the attempt to unskillfully survive and surmount the natural conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the attempt to survive by having a job and earning abundant not to be homeless. This spirit also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle but are not disposed(p) the possibility to be sure-fire and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be successful but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the woods Christopher does not have every desire to work and to change his life som ehow working is just a stem of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be construe differently but in some(prenominal)ways shows him as a wuss. It may also be analyzed as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American Dream stereotype of perfect and happy life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being reconcile for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for accomplished liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the attitude of people that have never had all the comforts to live properly without anguish for the next day and people that have always had everything but have never wanted this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs devotion negation and the refusal to accept church as a p lace where people can get real help and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain length from people. Christopher is alone too or it is better to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we take after in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do hardly have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an encouragement to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of voluntary social isolation, while interpersonal contacts would have through a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the existing American remains that cannot provide equal opportunities, in this case stinting opportunities, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it state s that the work that is being done is not paid according to other economical changes going on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-centeredness and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich while conducting her experiment forgets about the interpersonal issue and the wideness of warmhearted relations in order to keep a person ready to go ahead and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important factors are left out of the field of mountain of the author, while Into the wild describes a natural phenomenon of a personal desire to stay forth from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an artificial experiment or in other words a laboratory experiment where the remote factor becomes a bedcover in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books really worth of schooling in order to get around a w ell-shaped opinion regarding the eccentric of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be do according to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely tell books will lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the reconditeness have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment