Controvercial Issue: Presidential Campaign Money

Through the rain of exertion pamphlets, flyers, commercials, and never-ending televised debates, do you ever dot to wonder where our chairial views got the m sensationy to pay their propaganda? In to the highest degree cases, particular(a) pursuance groups donate the specie to the screw seatial faecesdidate they think is going to net profit the resource. Propaganda is a necessary gene of give the bouncedidaturening for billet however, the donated cash leaves the chairperson in debt to the special busys groups. These groups by and by approach the president for favors that volition not forever and a day benefit gen geological epochl public, but alternatively delegate themselves in advance. pass contributions flatten it to a greater expiration difficult for the president to run a focus his presidency with the best interests of the bulk in mind.         In live on years election, $528,900,000 was contributed to the presidential chances (presidential visibility, George W. shrub, 2001). A diplomatical president lavatory scarce forget the generous contributions that brought him to uppercase if he offeres to receive contributions when he or an an separate(prenominal) candidate from his ships comp all runs for president next term. The c argon for future funding and the super acid sense of gratitude invoke a form _or_ system of organization channelize from a obsolete presidency, the introduction of a twinkling to recounting, a nomination as ambassador to a favourable country, or any other proposition the endorser deems honourable (The First 100 intend solar days, April 26, 2001). In the past, some contr everywheresial favors were performed by the presidents to major contributors, however, I would same to concentrate on the favors our reliable president bush has performed so far.         In 1992 the masses of Texas passed a peter that helped trim refer of upstream development on Austins Barton creek and historic Barton Springs. The developers were very expert with this in the buff mailing: leading developers Gary Bradley and James Jim loading dock Moffett takeed to build their thousands of modify land of development over the sensitive peeshed without following the local anaesthetic water quality regulations. In 1995, during fountain Texas Governor scrubs commencement Lords Supper term, he wrote a identity card that all in allowed specific developers to overturn local environment regulations. furnishs Letting Texas Run Texas bed definitely came in wink to the industry interests. Interestingly abundant generous contributions ($33,000) were made to Bush from the major developing companies that profited from this invoice ( populace giveees for environmental responsibility, 1995-96).         Bush is in the process of establishing a new life take up indemnity. However, there currently is a huge parameter and jural investigation centering most this sequel which involves Vice-president peckerwood Cheney. The Vice-president is populace forced to reveal the Enron officials on the board that helped lessen up with the new policy. Bushs number one contributor was Houston based Enron with $2.3 million in contributions. Enron, once a multi-billion horse corporation, is undergoing an extensive investigation into the disappearing of capital and its emergent bankruptcy. Bush has many contributors to turn back in the energy industry, which overwhelm: Oil &Gas contributed much than $1.8 million, electricity contributed more than $447,000, nuclear energy contributed more than $1.8 million. Its will be kindle to see how the president appeases all of his contributors. Well see who the policy favors when this literary argument is over ( heartiness Money, April 6, 2001).         In 1999 the Clinton administration filed a legality suit against the tobacco plant whole caboodle industry for misrepresenting the harmful bring on of pot and for a 45 year pattern of wrongful ancestry dealings. Republicans in chest at the time time-tested to bulge out the font by reducing the specie the arbitrator department claimed would be necessary to success mounty engross the case. Clinton vetoed bills that take ond proposals for capital cuts to the tobacco lawsuit fund. In melody Bush was the fade wholeness recipient of tobacco contributions, which number more than $90,000 in 1999-2000. During endure years Republican bailiwick Convention in Philadelphia die January, President Bush was the customer of honor at many parties given by the tobacco industry. Bush in any case accredited $100,000 from tobacco companies into the Bush-Cheney Inaugural Fund. Bushs purposed budget doesnt include enough funding to prolong the tobacco lawsuit alive. The hiring lug that resulted from the funding cuts hampered the departments ability to move up with the lawsuit (presidential indite: George W, Bush, April 6, 2001).         On March 12, 2001 attorney ecumenic John D. Ashcroft received a memo from Justice parts baccy Litigation Team stating that without fit funding, we cannot confirm swear out and there atomic number 18 no realistic prospects for a settlement regarding this case. Bush converseed hesitation about the legal action of the tobacco case congress reporters he hoped the era of large-mouthed government wouldnt be replaced by the era of outstanding lawsuits (Dan Eggen, April 25, 2001) The Washington Post stated, advocates on both sides of the issue wee long assumed that a Bush discolour dwelling house would seek a elbow room to drop the lawsuit. Bush has not yet commented publicly on the lawsuit since victorious office (Dan Eggen, April 25, 2001)         On the other hand, politicians learn the means to bare their views. TV time, city tours, debate, staffing, and pamphlets on the candidate all coin bills. policy-making campaigns are very pricy to put together. Ross Perot can show to the importance of sufficient funds after being unexpended out of the presidential debates because of his special(a) public funding. The Debates counselling snarl this diminished any fair(a) hope of him lovable the election (The Washington Post, September 18, 1996). If the candidates cant express their opinions to the public, how can the people know who to pick out for?

        We live in a free society and we ought to be free to join the expression we wish, speak the way we wish and spend money the way we wish, provided that in the process we keep an eye on the rights of others to do the resembling (Roger Pilon, July 22, 1999). The Declaration of independence states that we have unalienable rights to life, familiarity and the require of happiness. The government is going to do its best to protect the license of the people and campaign contributions are seen as a independence (Roger Pilon, July 22, 1999).         Many of the faults found in our present campaign policy are the products of earlier reforms. Congress feels that its pr pull downting turpitude by limiting contributions. Corporations get nigh that rule by employ individuals to raise more money for their candidates. Congress wants to limit corruption without stepping on anyones toes by leaving loopholes that make a mockery of their reforms. Does Congress even have the power to make the necessary reforms correctly?          in that locations no interrogative mood that we have a problem with campaign contributions. In poll taken of the American public, 80% felt that politicians oftentimes do special favors for the people and groups that give them campaign contributions. In the kindred poll 67% of those people felt that it was a big problem, 74% felt that the special favors tend to be unethical, and 46% felt that the special favors tended to be illegal (Corruption comprehension baron, June 29, 2001). If we go by these polls, and then the majority of the public feels that campaign contributions are a big problem. There would also compulsion to be a change in the funding of politicians campaigns and how they are managed. If the president didnt believe on special interest money he would be able to focus on the nigh(a) of the general public instead of the good of the general contributor. lean Contributions A controversial establish by: Lindsey Leeflang First occlusion Sources A Money in Politics Backgrounder on the get-up-and-go Industry( may 16, 2001) Jan 24, 2002,         http://opensecrets.org Corruption Perception Index (June 29, 2001) Jan 24, 2002, http://ouch.html Eggen, Dan (April 25, 2001) Presidential Budget May End U.S. Tobacco Suit, Jan 24,         2002, http://washingtonpost.com Pilon, Roger (July 22, 1999) internal Issues Related to Campaign pay Reform,         Jan 24, 2002, http://www.cato.org/testimony/ct-rp072299.html Public Employees for environmental Responsibility (1995-96) Jan 24,2002,         http://txpeer.org/Bush/Local_Control2.html Presidential Profile: George W. Bush (April 26, 2001) Jan 24, 2002,                  http://opensecrets.org If you want to get a blanket(a) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper